Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/6212
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.coverage.spatialE. E. Portoviejoes_ES
dc.creatorCañarte Cañarte, Gilmar Jesús-
dc.creatorCañarte Bermúdez, Ernesto Gonzalo-
dc.creatorNavarrete Cedeño, José Bernardo-
dc.creatorDíaz Toral, Luis Fernando-
dc.creatorAlvarado Zamora, Carlos Eddy-
dc.creatorSánchez Mora, Fernando David-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T16:51:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-23T16:51:41Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/6212-
dc.description.abstractThis research was done to measure the effect of spacing between rows and plants on the growth, development, and production of the cotton variety BRS-336. Twelve plant densities were used: 55 556, 37 037, 27 778, 50 000, 33 333, 25 000, 45 455, 30 303, 22 727, 41 667, 27 778 and 20 833 pl ha-1, with single row planting arrangements. A randomized complete block design, in factorial arrangement (A x B), with four replications was used. The variables recorded were daily height increase (cm/day) in budding stage, plant height (cm), stem diameter (mm), crop canopy closure (days), internode length (cm), leaf greenness index (SPAD), number of cotton bolls opening/plant, number of open cotton bolls/plant, number of unopened cotton bolls/plant and yield of raw cotton (kg ha-1). The results obtained in the research indicate that spacing between plants (m) was significantly influential in most of the agronomic and productive variables, compared to the spacing between rows, while the interaction was not significant. The plant spacing of 0.2 m showed the best plant development in the growth stage. The spacing of 0.2 m between plants recorded the lowest values in the productive traits, whereas spacing with 0.3 m and 0.4 m reported the best behavior. The spacing of 1.1m between rows and 0.3 m between plants showed the best Marginal Rate of Return for cultivated cotton with the variety “BRS-336”. The combination of the studied factors registered higher values in agronomic and productive variables when compared to the control treatment (conventional spacing used by farmers).es_ES
dc.format.extentp. 19-26es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/*
dc.subjectRAW COTTONes_ES
dc.subjectSPACINGes_ES
dc.subjectPRODUCTIVITYes_ES
dc.titlePerformance of the cotton variety BRS-336 under different seed densitieses_ES
dc.typeRevistaes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCañarte-Cañarte, G.J., Cañarte-Bermúdez,E.G., Navarrete-Cedeño, J.B., Díaz-Toral,L.F., Alvarado-Zamora, C.E. and SánchezMora,F.D. (2024). Performance of the cotton variety BRS-336 under different seed densities. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 39(Special issue 2): 19-26. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2023/39/s2.19.26es_ES
dc.title.serieSarhad Journal of Agriculture, 39 (Special issue 2): 19-26es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revistas EEP

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Performance of the Cotton Variety BRS-336 Under Different Seed.pdfPerformance of the Cotton Variety BRS-336 Under Different Seed339,46 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons