Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/4638
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.coverage.spatialE. E. Santa Catalinaes_ES
dc.creatorCarrión Yaguana, Vanessa-
dc.creatorAlwang, Jeffrey-
dc.creatorNorton, George W.-
dc.creatorBarrera, Víctor Hugo-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T19:02:33Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-20T19:02:33Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-
dc.identifier.issn0021-857X-
dc.identifier.other*EC-INIAP-BEESC-MGC. Quito (Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(2):308-323. 2016CD)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/4638-
dc.description.abstractIntegrated pest management (IPM) potentially reduces pesticide use and costs of agricultural production. However, IPM is knowledge intensive and its spread may dissipate over time due to knowledge required for its effective implementation and to competing messages about pest control. We examine IPM spread and adoption several years after formal intensive IPM outreach efforts ceased in a potato-producing region in Ecuador. We describe adoption patterns and sources of IPM knowledge in 2012 and compare them with patterns that existed when outreach ceased in 2003. Results show that IPM adoption continues in the area but with a lower proportion of farmers fully adopting all practices and a higher proportion adopting low to moderate levels as compared to 2003. Almost all potato farmers in the area use some IPM practices, reflecting a major increase in IPM use. Farmer-to-farmer spread has supplanted formal training and outreach mechanisms. IPM adoption significantly lowers pesticide use and saves production costs for adopters.es_ES
dc.format.extentp. 308-323es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.subjectPAPAes_ES
dc.subjectSOLANUM TUBEROSUMes_ES
dc.subjectMANEJO INTEGRADO DE PLAGASes_ES
dc.subjectADOPCIÓN DE INNOVACIONESes_ES
dc.subjectDIFUSIÓN DE LA INVESTIGACIÓNes_ES
dc.subjectTRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGÍAes_ES
dc.subjectTECNOLOGÍA APROPIADAes_ES
dc.titleDoes IPM have staying power? Revisiting a potato-producing area years after formal training endedes_ES
dc.typeRevistaes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCarrión Yaguana, V., Alwang, J., Norton, G.W., & Barrera, V.H. (june, 2016). Does IPM have staying power? Revisiting a potato-producing area years after formal training ended. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(2), 308-323. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552-12140es_ES
dc.title.serieJournal of Agricultural Economics 67(2):308-323es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de Revistas EESC

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
iniapscR2016v67n2p308CD.pdf433,26 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons